Pairwise preference
rlhf-pairwise.jsonTwo candidate continuations from one state, with an ordering.
File metadata
- pair_id
- p01-density-over-collective-reward-per-agent
- synthetic_rejected
- false
- prompt
- Resolve how a collective-state density model should feed a per-agent PPO update.
- margin
- decisive
context
The existing mean-field PPO has a TD value head per agent. The requested CRL critic models transitions of the collective state, so the first proposed integration made one collective value shared by all agents.
rejected
chosen
critique
Can the V_crl also be per-agent? meaning we can use crl critic to estimate the collective state density ratio, but then for a given state for the reward use the single agent reward? so the density ratio is still over the collective state but the reward is for the single agent within that collective state. does that make sense?
principle
Separate the object that must be collective from the quantity that must remain per-agent. Shared dynamics or density ratios do not require collapsing the reward or credit-assignment signal.
downstream_evidence
The resulting implementation kept the existing per-agent reward path and substituted only the baseline. It smoke-tested in discrete and continuous modes, and later full runs established a direct CRL-versus-TD comparison without changing the reward definition.